Thanks, I considered this, but I think that passing the full XPath
makes debugging easier and will be more robust if I change the source
XML (it has a chance of still working, instead of being guaranteed not
to work.
simon
On Saturday, January 18, 2003, at 02:34 AM, Dimitre Novatchev wrote:
Instead of using the XPath expression to a node as its unique id, use
the pair:
(count(ancestor::node()), count(preceding::node()) )
This means that you will be passing as parameter a pair of numbers,
e.g.:
3,15
---
anti-spam: do not post this address publicly
www.simonwoodside.com -- 99% Devil, 1% Angel
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list