"Gregory Murphy" <Gregory(_dot_)Murphy(_at_)eng(_dot_)sun(_dot_)com> wrote in
message
news:Pine(_dot_)GSO(_dot_)4(_dot_)10(_dot_)10301012146290(_dot_)12101-100000(_at_)gris(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)
Assuming an element 'n' with children elements 'c', and some number
of
other, unknown, children elements, the only way that I know to test
for the
presence of elements other than 'c' is:
<xsl:template match="n">
<xsl:if test="*[name() != 'c']">
<!-- Do stuff -->
</xsl:if>
</xsl:template>
This strikes me as somewhat awkward. Is there a more direct test?
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Depends on how one defines "more direct". For example, is the following
more direct?
<xsl:template match="n[*[not(self::c)]]">
<!-- Do stuff -->
</xsl:template>
=====
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev.
http://fxsl.sourceforge.net/ -- the home of FXSL
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list