Hi,
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-xsl-
list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com] On Behalf Of Daniel Veillard
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 11:57:51PM +0200, J.Pietschmann wrote:
If you dig deeper you'll uncover a lot more problems with document(),
both for users and implementors. For example, accessing the URL might
have side effects in the server, and some people want to access the URL
The people who still don't understand that GET should not have
side effects deserve to have failing code, failing business and
get back to reading specs.
Sorry for misunderstanding.., but are you saying that people who use the
document() are idiots? Are you saying the people who say '*never* use
document,' are idiots? Are you just saying that you need to control what
happens with the uri resolution?
Curious,
-Rob
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard(_at_)redhat(_dot_)com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list