Thanks for all the suggestions. Unfortunately, the ones that work are
easy enough to do by hand but difficult if not impossible to do in a
conversion program. I don't see a way to determine in code where to put
the variable binding statement. It would be entirely dependent on the
surrounding XSL code.
In any case, I discovered that I can solve the particular construct we
use most commonly by recoding it as following-sibling::*.
Thanks, again, everyone.
On Tuesday, April 15, 2003, at 06:04 PM, Wendell Piez wrote:
No, but it is easy enough to bind the position of the current node
outside a predicate or other context that changes the context node,
then test against the variable.
Jim Hart, Project Manager
Academic Technology Services
Library and Information Services
Bates College
Lewiston, Maine, USA
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list