At 09:28 16/05/2003 +0100, you wrote:
> I still contend that type doesn't belong in XSLT,
Careful Kurt, Mike Kay will accuse you of talking rubbish!
Dave,
Inadvertently, I am sure, you omitted what Kurt went on to say. I quote it
here for your convenience:
>I still contend that type doesn't belong in XSLT, but if it is in there, it
>should make processes more efficient, not less. If type needs to be there,
>then all of XSD should be supported, such that an XSLT function can return
>an object of complex type Foo.
Would you be happy if the XSLT WG went on to heed Kurt's second option and
implemented all of XSD Schema?
Andrew Watt
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list