On Thu, 15 May 2003, Kevin Jones wrote:
We have a general XSLT benchmark that we use for comparing processor
performance (see www.sarvega.com). On XalanJ 2.5D1 it indicates XSLTC is
roughly x3 the performance of XalanJ.
In my own tests I have come to results that indicate C version to be
better/ more performace when processing document oriented data. And Java
based better when dealing with data oriented sourcetree.
Cheers,
Jarkko
The results are very uniform probably
indicating this is a fairly good estimate for most stylesheet types.
Kev.
On Thursday 15 May 2003 09:01, Dennis wrote:
Hi All,
Is there any benchmark analysis pertaining to XML
transformation between XSL and XSLTC (Translets)
supported by Apache.
Means who gives the better performance in terms of
transformation usage of XSL or XSLTC.
A comparative analysis for both will help a lot
Thanks in Advance
-Dennis
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
****************************************************************
Jarkko Moilanen "Erehtyminen on inhimillista,
Researcher mutta todella suuret mokat
jm60697(_at_)uta(_dot_)fi vaativat tietokoneen käyttöä."
www.uta.fi/~jm60697
GSM: +358 50 3766 927
****************************************************************
* ITCM | Information Technology and Crisis Management
* http://www.itcm.org
****************************************************************
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list