From: Dimitre Novatchev
Do any examples exist when such implicit casting would be
dangerous/counter-intuitive? If not, then it would be very
useful to allow
implicit casting to string.
I'd like to see that on the xsl:stylesheet element.
typing="no"
then we could forget the types all together,
as some people seem to think is possible [see xml-dev archive], yet this
example
shows isn't.
Then Dimitre's example would work.
regards DaveP
*** snip here ****
-
NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use,
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your
system.
RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.
Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of RNIB.
RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227
Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list