Well, that's what I thought at first when I tried it before copy-of, but
apparently all the child element attributes are not copied. I needed a
deep copy so that's why I used copy-of. Thanks for your suggestions.
No, using position()> 1 would be equivalent (except more efficient)
than what you had. If you lost child element markup but got th
echaracter data you probably used value-of some-where (that's what
value-of does) but that is a separate issue than the selection.
David
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list