On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Dimitre Novatchev wrote:
I tried and it works OK, producing the expected results, using the same
xsltProc xslt processor.
Hmmmm. I'm using
Using libxml 20507, libxslt 10030 and libexslt 720
xsltproc was compiled against libxml 20507, libxslt 10030 and libexslt
720
libxslt 10030 was compiled against libxml 20507
libexslt 720 was compiled against libxml 20507
which is a bit newer than the version you are using.
I get the following (obviously incorrect) output.
Does anyone know why this newer version of libxslt and
libexslt do not act as expected?
Thanks,
Saverio
--
<table>
<tr>
<td>Vermont</td>
<td>Virgin_Islands</td>
<td>Virginia</td>
<td>Washington</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>South_Dakota</td>
<td>Tennessee</td>
<td>Texas</td>
<td>Utah</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nebraska</td>
<td>Nevada</td>
<td>Pennsylvania</td>
<td>Puerto_Rico</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kansas</td>
<td>Kentucky</td>
<td>Maine</td>
<td>Maryland</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Washington</td>
<td>West_Virginia</td>
<td>Wisconsin</td>
<td>Wyoming</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Maine</td>
<td>Massachusetts</td>
<td>Michigan</td>
<td>Maryland</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Minnesota</td>
<td>Missouri</td>
<td>Massachusetts</td>
<td>Michigan</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Georgia</td>
<td>Hawaii</td>
<td>Idaho</td>
<td>Guam</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Iowa</td>
<td>Kansas</td>
<td>Illinois</td>
<td>Indiana</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vermont</td>
<td>Virgin_Islands</td>
<td>Virginia</td>
<td>Utah</td>
</tr>
</table>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list