RE: Sintaxis of ROW[(@id >= 1) and (@id <= 10)]

Thanks David!

You gave me the clue. I understood why ../paging/window, when using in 
xsl:value-of, returns the correct number, and it was  because the "paging" node 
is sibling of the parent of ROW. When using ROW[(_at_)id .....], i am actually 
addressing ROW's children, so, I solved it by using:

ROW[(_at_)id >= ../../paging/window]

By the way, the actual XML structure was this:

<search>
  <ROWSET>
    <ROW id="1"></ROW>
    <ROW id="2"></ROW>
    ....
  </ROWSET>
  <paging>
    <windowW>1</window>
  </paging>
</search>

Thanks for all
Jaime


> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: owner-xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com]En nombre de 
> David
> Carlisle
> Enviado el: Miércoles, 12 de Noviembre de 2003 13:21
> Para: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
> Asunto: Re: [xsl] Sintaxis of ROW[(@id &gt;= 1) and (@id &lt;= 10)]
>
>
>
> @id &gt;= number(../paging/window)
>
> you don't need number() there as &gt; will coerce its arguments to be
> numeric automatically.
>
> Most likely it is the wrong path. the above would work if 
> paging is a sibling of ROW and has a child called window,
> but I suspect that ROW and paging are not children of the same parent,
> so the xpath selects nothing.
>
> David
>
> -- 
> http://www.dcarlisle.demon.co.uk/matthew
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
> This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
> service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
> anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
> http://www.star.net.uk
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list