Hi,
<TABLE border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" height="5px"
align="center">
<TR>
<TD class="LabelBM" style="width:30px">10/03/2004</TD>
WRT HTML output, I'd recommend you lable the TR element with class "LabelBM"
and write your CSS using .LabelBM > TD, the generated HTML is cleaner that way.
<TD class="LabelBM" style="width:30px">11/03/2004</TD>
<TD class="LabelBM" style="width:30px">12/03/2004</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD class="LabelBM" style="width:30px">70.45</TD>
<TD class="LabelBM" style="width:30px">90.45</TD>
<TD class="LabelBM" style="width:30px">90.55</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
I do this with XSL:
<TABLE border="0" class="DatosHotel"
cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" height="5px" align="center">
<TR>
<xsl:for-each
select="DETAILS/LDAYS/DAY">
Here you process all the DETAILS in the document. Instead, use
xsl:for-each DETAILS/LDAYS
table
xsl:for-each DAY
tr
…
xsl:for-each DAY
tr
…
or if you want everything into the same table,
table
xsl:for-each DETAILS/LDAYS
xsl:for-each DAY
tr
…
xsl:for-each DAY
tr
…
statement? How is
more eficient, as my way or with a copy statement?
There's nothing to really copy in your transformation because the input and
output tree use completely different elements even thought the trees are not
unlike in structure.
Cheers,
Jarno - Dulce Liquido: Psicosis
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list