> .. The characters in the document looks good though (as if
> the actual encoding was ISO-8859-1)
They would do. ISO-8859-1 is essentially a subset of UTF-8==Unicode. UTF-8 is
I expect the common default.
The set of characters in ISO-8859-1 is a subset of the characters in
utf8 but the encodings of those characters are different. The lower half
of ISO-8859-1 (that is, ascii) has the same encoding in ISO-8859-1 and
utf8 but the upper half has different encodings (taking one byte in
ISO-8859-1 and two in utf8). So If you get these encodings mixed you
would not expect the characters to "look good" in fact you'd expect to
see a lot of spurious accented A symbols (questions about which
account for a fair amount of the messages on this list:-)
David
--
http://www.dcarlisle.demon.co.uk/matthew
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list