On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 03:31:54AM +0400, David Tolpin wrote:
I think I did made my views known at the right time and in the
right places, i.e. where that made sense. I think I also complained
to Sharon and you at the time when Saxon used liberally RVT as
node-set inputs.
Would not it be logical then not to support exsl:node-set() in libxslt?
Instead of declaring it supported when in fact it is not due to
implementation problems?
Well it woks well enough for a number of people... We actually tried
to fix all the bug reported ! Agreed we had a lot of troubles due to
the reason I exposed ...
That's something I don't understand, you seems fine posting to this
list "don't use libxslt" but I don't see your bug report on libxslt
bugzilla ;-)
You're clearly a good programmer, maybe you don't like my code, that's
fine, still I find your reaction a bit surprising.
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel(_at_)veillard(_dot_)com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ |
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list