Re: XPath is NOT a functional language

> > > > > "Kenny" == Kenny Akridge <kenny(_at_)akridgefamily(_dot_)com> writes:
    Kenny> I'm just curious- what specifically makes you believe that
    Kenny> XPath is not functional?  And when I say XPath, I am
    Kenny> referring to the spec, not an implementation.

Because:

a) You cannot define functions within XPath, and
b) You cannot pass function definitions as arguments to functions.

Either is sufficient.
-- 
Colin Paul Adams
Preston Lancashire