Re: XPath is NOT a functional language2004-03-30 10:12:14"Kenny" == Kenny Akridge <kenny(_at_)akridgefamily(_dot_)com> writes: Kenny> I'm just curious- what specifically makes you believe that Kenny> XPath is not functional? And when I say XPath, I am Kenny> referring to the spec, not an implementation. Because: a) You cannot define functions within XPath, and b) You cannot pass function definitions as arguments to functions. Either is sufficient. -- Colin Paul Adams Preston Lancashire
|
|