Nice, thanks for the correction and the info David! I will file this
away for future needs.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc(_at_)nag(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 7:27 AM
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [xsl] Passing arrays as parameters
A slightly less expensive way to do this is to pass the array in as a
string of XML-like data and then serialize it into a node-set using
the
node-set function particular to your processor. Then you can process
it
just like any other node-set.
Best of luck!
<M:D/>
If you passed in a string with XML syntax you'd want a parse extension
function not a node-set() (ie the opposite of serialization) Saxon for
example offers such a function.
On the other hand, if called from an API ratherthan from a command line,
most XSLT engines will allow you to pass in a node set as a parameter so
no extension function should be needed.
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
--+------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--+--