On Sat, 2004-05-15 at 12:57 +0200, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
From: Shaun ONeil [mailto:shaun(_at_)oneil(_dot_)me(_dot_)uk]
Is there any reason in particular why your input looks the way it does?
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="testcase.xsl"?>
<test>
<fragment><p>A <acronym title="HyperText Markup
Language">HTML</acronym> fragment</p></fragment>
</test>
I hadn't thought of treating the HTML as XML, so I'd experimented with
CDATA sections .. then realised it was having the same effect as
entities, so I stuck with that to keep on eless complication (CDATA) out
of the puzzle
The content of the fragment node is actually valid XML, so why not just make
it:
<fragment>
<p>A <acronym title="HyperText Markup Language">HTML</acronym>
fragment</p>
</fragment>
to begin with. Then you won't need d-o-e after all, just use
<xsl:copy-of select="fragment/p" />
to copy it to the result tree...
I'm dealing with XHTML 1.0 Strict, for both the source fragments and the
rendered document .. so they should always be valid XML :o) Once again
my common flaw of sticking with what I was used to (value-of) rather
that looking to see what other tools are available - copy-of
"fragment/*" is doing the trick perfectly.
HTH!
Greetz,
Andreas
It does indeed,
Thanks
Shaun