I've no idea which version of LotusXSL you are using or what its current
status is, but if you are considering switching for performance reasons,
then Xalan is not a particularly good choice. Among the Java processors,
Saxon is often 3-5 times faster than Xalan.
Michael Kay
-----Original Message-----
From: shishir(_dot_)srivastava(_at_)sgcib(_dot_)com
[mailto:shishir(_dot_)srivastava(_at_)sgcib(_dot_)com]
Sent: 06 January 1999 21:58
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: [xsl] Advise wanted.
Hi,
I have been using LotusXSL(supplied along with Domino Release
5) parser to
transform xml to HTML.
It works fine.
But somewhere i came acroos that instead, if i use the latest
rel of Xalan
(since xalan has eventually grown a lot since IBM donated it
to Apache ),
i could get a significant performance benefit.
Any comments ,links or pointer would be great help.
Thanks & Regards
___________________________
Shishir Srivastava
*****************************************************************
The addressee's email address has changed to
firstname.lastname@ sgcib.com. You may want to update your
personal address book. Please see http://www.sgcib.com for more
information.
This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential
and intended solely for the addressee(s). Any unauthorised use or
dissemination is prohibited.E-mails are susceptible to alteration.
Neither SOCIETE GENERALE nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates
shall be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified.
*****************************************************************
--+------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail:
<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--+--