At 2004-06-10 06:53 -0400, Chris Loschen wrote:
Quick sanity check -- I've got two templates like this:
<xsl:template match="a | b | c">...</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="*[(_at_)length]">...</xsl:template>
My assumption has been that the first of these is more specific
and so would have a higher priority than the second, but my output
suggests that the second is firing instead of the first. Is my assumption
faulty,
Yes. Priorities are applied *severally*, as if you had three separate
template rules for your first template rule, each with only a simple name
and a priority of zero. Your second rule is more complex than a simple
name, therefore it has higher priority of .5.
Note that there are no higher implied priorities ... all patterns more
complex than a simple name have an implied priority of .5.
I hope this helps.
......................... Ken
--
Public courses: Spring 2004 world tour of hands-on XSL instruction
Next: 3-day XSLT/XPath; 2-day XSL-FO - Birmingham, UK June 14,2004
World-wide on-site corporate, govt. & user group XML/XSL training.
G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman(_at_)CraneSoftwrights(_dot_)com
Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/
Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995)
Male Breast Cancer Awareness http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/bc
Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal