Re: And operator usage in XSL

Eliot Kimber wrote:

position= isn't an FO property (probably meant absolute-position=) butin any case only block-container can be absolutely positioned.


It's a shorthand (sect. 7.29.20). I can't find the restriction that
only block-containers may be absolutely positioned in the spec,
can you help me here?

J.Pietschmann

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: Using vars, (continued) RE: Using vars, Passin, Tom RE: Using vars, xptm Re: Using vars, David Carlisle Re: Using vars, David Carlisle Re: Using vars, xptm And operator usage in XSL, Arulraj Re: And operator usage in XSL, David Carlisle Re: And operator usage in XSL, Arulraj Re: And operator usage in XSL, J.Pietschmann Re: And operator usage in XSL, Eliot Kimber Re: And operator usage in XSL, J.Pietschmann <= Re: And operator usage in XSL, Eliot Kimber Re: position= and blocks (was And operator usage in XSL), Eliot Kimber Re: position= and blocks (was And operator usage in XSL), john farrow Re: position= and blocks (was And operator usage in XSL), J.Pietschmann Re: position= and blocks (was And operator usage in XSL), Eliot Kimber Re: position= and blocks (was And operator usage in XSL), john farrow Re: position= and blocks (was And operator usage in XSL), Eliot Kimber Re: position= and blocks (was And operator usage in XSL), john farrow Re: position= and blocks (was And operator usage in XSL), Eliot Kimber Re: position= and blocks (was And operator usage in XSL), J.Pietschmann

Previous by Date:	Re: Background images in XSL, J.Pietschmann
Next by Date:	Spotting "cousin marriages" in a tree, Phil Endecott
Previous by Thread:	Re: And operator usage in XSL, Eliot Kimber
Next by Thread:	Re: And operator usage in XSL, Eliot Kimber
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]