On Aug 14, 2004, at 11:30 AM, Wendell Piez wrote:
Because you have a single template in phase-1 it is less of an issue
here.
Ah, but things get more complicated, because the mods data needs to be
processed one way for the citations (coded in the docbook namespace),
and another way for the bibliography proper (which is in the mods
namespace).
It's also a good time to think about names. Maybe change "phase-1" to
"enhance-year" or some such and make phase-2 the default mode --
depending on where you think this stylesheet will go (if anywhere).
It's really a maintenance question, I think.
Yeah, what I did was to change "phase-1" to "raw-biblist" and "phase-2"
to "processed-biblist." I then created a "bibliography" mode and a
"citation" mode.
The former works fine, but the latter not (I can't access my newly
create year and suffix elements). Yet another case of spending hours
in utter confusion ;-)
I'll try your suggestion of having phase-2 mode default; that may work
better (I hope!). Then from within the db:citation template I guess
I'd call the mods;mods template in the "citation" mode, and in the
mods:modsCollection element I'd call it in "bibliography" mode.
I'll worry about the namespace problem later.
Bruce