Re: XSLT, XHTML, and default attribute values [somewhat OT]
2004-09-14 13:32:51
At 03:05 PM 9/14/2004, Joe wrote:
There seems to be a continuum of "levels of interest", from the basic
lexical structure, to the "infoset" explicit in the document, to the
type-annotated infoset, to the infoset augmented with default
values. The problem is that there's no way to tell my tools what
level I'm interested in.
This is nicely put, with the caveat that some of us might like to consider
type annotations to be a higher level than an infoset augmented with
defaults -- which can, after all, always be considered as "just strings".
In either case, it appears to be a semantic hierarchy, as contextual
information is brought to bear as you go from bottom to top.
Cheers,
Wendell
======================================================================
Wendell Piez
mailto:wapiez(_at_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: XSLT, XHTML, and default attribute values [somewhat OT], (continued)
- Re: XSLT, XHTML, and default attribute values [somewhat OT], Colin Paul Adams
- Re: XSLT, XHTML, and default attribute values [somewhat OT], David Carlisle
- RE: XSLT, XHTML, and default attribute values [somewhat OT], Andrew Welch
- RE: XSLT, XHTML, and default attribute values [somewhat OT], Andrew Welch
- RE: XSLT, XHTML, and default attribute values [somewhat OT], Andrew Welch
|
|
|