xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

import/include and file structure

2004-09-04 11:40:35
I'm trying to get what I've been working on into shape to distribute more widely, and am wondering if my approach to modularizing the (xslt 2.0) code makes sense.

I have a main file that looks like:

<!-- read the external citation style file -->
<xsl:param name="citation-style" required="yes" as="xs:string" />

<xsl:variable name="styles" as="document-node()"
  select="doc(concat('../styles/',$citation-style, '.csl'))" />

<!-- set the citation class parameter (e.g. author-year) as specified in the style file --> <xsl:param name="citation-class" select="$styles/cs:citationstyle/@class"/>

<xsl:include href="core.xsl" />
<xsl:include href="drivers.xsl" />
<xsl:include href="render-classes.xsl" />

Each of these included files in turn includes other files. So, for example, core.xsl looks like:

<xsl:include href="core/css.xsl" />
<xsl:include href="core/functions.xsl" /> <!-- all function code -->
<xsl:include href="core/render-mods.xsl" /> <!-- all general rendering code -->
<xsl:include href="core/style.xsl" />

The "render-classes.xsl" file looks like this:

<xsl:include href="render-classes/author-year/render.xsl"/> <!-- all rendering code specific to author-year class --> <xsl:include href="render-classes/note/render.xsl"/> <!-- all rendering code specific to footnote/endnote class -->

I am using conditional statements on the class-specific templates to keep stuff separate in processing.

Is it fine or me to be using include in this way, or is there a compelling reason for me to be importing instead? I recall Wendell's discussion about import precedence and such, but am not sure practically whether this matters in this case.

Bruce



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • import/include and file structure, Bruce D'Arcus <=