-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
has any of you experience regarding the performance of copy compared to
copy-of in xsltproc?
Right now I'm copying some parts of the source tree completly while
filtering some other parts.
I use the following template:
~ <xsl:template match="/ | @* | node()">
~ <xsl:copy>
~ <xsl:apply-templates select="@* | node()"/>
~ </xsl:copy>
~ </xsl:template>
My question is, if I want to copy a complete element, is it faster to use
~ <xsl:template match='dontfilterme'>
~ <xsl:copy-of select='.'/>
~ </xsl:template>
or the default template above?
How much does the complexity of the copied element influence the speed?
Any pointers appreciated,
Wolfgang
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBYl8JqjaicDyx8o8RAtBrAJ91d6Xl6aWTPlx237bBzlsvAP4/ZgCfYla/
UbqeRlsJgfxzdOZ9jLmDE4U=
=/bpn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----