doc() and temp trees as xinclude processor?

I just had a thought after working with the doc() function in XSLT 2.0:

Instead of using an external xinclude processor to resolve xincludes, 
why not just do all in XSLT by using a temporary tree?
Bruce


--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--