RE: Recursive grouping - simple, XSLT 1.0, fast non-Muenchian grouping method
2004-12-20 14:41:38
At 04:03 PM 12/20/2004, Mike wrote:
> The presented algorithm works much faster than Muenchian
> grouping without xsl:key
The use of xsl:key is essential to Muenchian grouping, so there seems to be
some misunderstanding here.
Is this the case? All the key retrievals in Muenchian grouping (and all key
retrievals period, IIUC) can be done using brute force location paths with
predicates. (But it's true that the particular contribution Steve Muench
made to the method in XSLT may be the application of keys: is this what
makes the method "Muenchian"?)
Not that I am recommending this.
I rather liked the proposed recursive method. Apart from performance
(generally not a problem for me in any case :-), it's neat -- maybe even
clearer to understand, for the newbie, than Muenchian.
The really under-utilized grouping method, however (to my mind), is the
variable-based grouping technique Ken Holman has proposed and demonstrated.
It may not be as general-purpose as these others -- but when it can be
applied it's both simple and fast.
Cheers,
Wendell
======================================================================
Wendell Piez
mailto:wapiez(_at_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Recursive grouping - simple, XSLT 1.0, fast non-Muenchian grouping method, (continued)
- Re: Recursive grouping - simple, XSLT 1.0, fast non-Muenchian grouping method, JBryant
- Re: Recursive grouping - simple, XSLT 1.0, fast non-Muenchian grouping method, Dimtre Novatchev
- RE: Recursive grouping - simple, XSLT 1.0, fast non-Muenchian grouping method, Michael Kay
- Re: Recursive grouping - simple, XSLT 1.0, fast non-Muenchian grouping method, M. David Peterson
- RE: Recursive grouping - simple, XSLT 1.0, fast non-Muenchian grouping method,
Wendell Piez <=
- Re: Recursive grouping - simple, XSLT 1.0, fast non-Muenchian grouping method, Sergiu Ignat
- Re: Recursive grouping - simple, XSLT 1.0, fast non-Muenchian grouping method, M. David Peterson
- Some results (was: Re: [xsl] Recursive grouping - simple, XSLT 1.0, fast non-Muenchian grouping method), Dimtre Novatchev
- Re: Some results (was: Re: [xsl] Recursive grouping - simple, XSLT 1.0, fast non-Muenchian grouping method), Dimtre Novatchev
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: Recursive grouping - simple, XSLT 1.0, fast non-Muenchian grouping method, M. David Peterson |
Next by Date: |
Re: Translating roman numerals into integers with XSLT 2.0, Mukul Gandhi |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: Recursive grouping - simple, XSLT 1.0, fast non-Muenchian grouping method, M. David Peterson |
Next by Thread: |
Re: Recursive grouping - simple, XSLT 1.0, fast non-Muenchian grouping method, Sergiu Ignat |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|