I apologize for the original message...it had some formatting errors that
resulted in a typo. The if statement should read 'position()!=1'.
Thanks,
David
----- Original Message -----
From: David Brown <david(_dot_)brown(_at_)alcatel(_dot_)com>
Date: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 2:18 pm
Subject: [xsl] Problem using tables with grouping in xsl 2.0
I'm in a situation where I'm creating an html table from groups. I
want =
to have my gouping key in one column, and the elements of the
group in =
the next column. The elements should appear one per row, and the
key =
will span these rows.
The problem I have is that to create the appropritate table, all
but the =
first element of the group needs both <tr> and <td> tags, while
the =
first does not. However, I can find now way to distinguish the
first =
element from the rest. In the 1.1 xsl, I used 'if
position()!=3D1', but =
it seems that position returns the element's position within the =
document, not within the group.
If you need me to try to include code I can, but it's pretty
confusing =
out of context, so I thought it would be easier to just describe
the =
problem.
Thanks for any advice you might have.
-David
--~----------------------------------------------------------------
--
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--