Would be nice to know if matches() would get me the same result...
<xsl:for-each select="part/section/par[(_at_)class='45_UeberschrPara' and
contains(text(), 'In-Kraft-Treten')]/following::text()">
<xsl:analyze-string select="." regex="\d{{1,2}}.+\d{{4}}">
<xsl:matching-substring>
<xsl:call-template name="get.date">
<xsl:with-param name="text" select="."
as="xs:string"/>
</xsl:call-template>
</xsl:matching-substring>
</xsl:analyze-string>
</xsl:for-each>
should be equivalent to
<xsl:for-each select="part/section/par[(_at_)class='45_UeberschrPara' and
contains(text(),
'In-Kraft-Treten')]/following::text()[matches(.,\d{1,2}.+\d{4})">
<xsl:call-template name="get.date">
<xsl:with-param name="text" select="."
as="xs:string"/>
</xsl:call-template>
</xsl:for-each>
(untested)
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--