I use exclusively f:map() where normally one would use xsl:for-each.
what is the benefit? i suppose you do it for a specific benefit or is it because
of syntactical preference.
As already demonstrated in my recent code, I am increasingly using the
FXSL HOF wrappers of the corresponding "original" XPath F & Os -- such
as:
f:mult() instead of '*'
f:add() instead of '+'
f:mod() instead of mod
f:string-length() instead of string-length()
f:name() instead of name()
i would like to read your reasons for this. i have been working on a paper tbat
has parts that relates to fxsl, and i have found a similar habit in using
functions at a higher level, but i think my experiences are probably different
than yours as i have taken a different approach.
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--