Re: DTD to Scheme

George Cristian Bina wrote:

> In general UPA violations are easily solved if you rewrite the 
> ambiguous model in a non ambiguous way. In your case
> <!ELEMENT item (risid,(waiting|passing|(waiting,passing)))>
>
> can be written as
>
> <!ELEMENT item (risid,((waiting, passing?)|passing))>
Yes, this is exactly what I need.
Thanks.

> and the corresponding schema will be valid.
>
>
> Hope that helps,
> George
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> George Cristian Bina
> <oXygen/> XML Editor, Schema Editor and XSLT Editor/Debugger
> http://www.oxygenxml.com


--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--