oh I should have said, probably just using
<xsl:number/>
would also give you what you want (and might b emore erricient than
using count() on preceding::, I seem to remember Michael saying saxon
(at least) spots when consecutive executions of xsl:number are going to
just increase some count by 1, and just does that internally rather than
really doing the count each time.
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--