see the thread
Subject: RE: [xsl] following-sibling and xsl:sort
earlier today where exactly this point was explained (By Michael, more
clearly than me I think in this case)
Do I somehow need to create a parallel result tree?
probably that's the easiest thing to do.
First sort then process.
<xsl:variable name="x">
<xsl:for-each select="ITEM">
<xsl:sort select="@NAME"/>
<xsl:copy-of select="."/>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:variable>
<xsl:for-each select="$x/ITEM">
<xsl:sort select="@NAME"/>
<xsl:result-document href="./{$something}.html" format="myhtml">
.....
<xsl:value-of select="following-sibling::*[1]/@NAME"/> <!--next
sorted ITEM ? -->
....
</xsl:result-document>
</xsl:for-each>
There are probably slightly more involved ways that avoid copying all
the item nodes, but the above is the basic idea.
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--