Then I'd like to ask that it remain implementation-specific, so that I can
keep getting plain text when I run my tools from the command line. I don't
need a bunch of goobledygook cluttering up my debugging messages.
Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services
(presently consulting at Synergistic Solution Technologies)
Kevin Rodgers <kevin(_dot_)rodgers(_at_)ihs(_dot_)com>
04/08/2005 04:48 PM
Please respond to
xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
To
xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
cc
Subject
RE: [xsl] [XSLT] xsl:message output encoding ?
Michael Kay writes:
Can we specify the output encoding for xsl:message ?
Everything about the output of xsl:message is implementation-defined. So
you
need to ask the question in relation to a specific product.
Then I would like to formally petition the working group to specify that
the serialization of xsl:message should respect the xsl:output
declaration, just like the serialization of the result document. How do
I go about that?
--
Kevin Rodgers
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--