Actually the equivalence is to:
<xsl:for-each select="$in">
<xsl:sort select="."/>
<xsl:sequence select="."/>
</xsl:for-each>
since no copying is involved.
ah yes, thanks.
Any reason why xsl:sequence doesn't take xsl:sort
so the equivalence would be
<xsl:sequence select="$in">
<xsl:sort select="."/>
</xsl:sequence>
which would I think mean that xsl:perform-sort was identical to
xsl:sequence?
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--