Chris, this is extremely similar to the "period group" post that from a few
weeks ago, and as amenable to the tree-walking approach that, IMO, was the
best solution posted. The notion of adjacency just makes the problems that
much more alike.
See this thread:
http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/200505/msg00120.html
Regards,
--A
From: chris <oneskiingfool(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
Reply-To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
To: xslt <xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
Subject: [xsl] Merging nested/adjacent nodes
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 14:42:56 -0600
Hello,
I'm really stuck on this one. It's probably a little too offbeat for
someone to just have the code handy ready to copy & paste.... but I
I'll give it a shot as I've already spent way too much time spinning
my wheels on it ;)
I basically want to merge adjacent nodes on a given attribute. It
originally seemed would be simple enough to do with using
for-each-group and group-adjacent. But the fact that I have mixed
nodes in there seems to screw that whole thing up.
_________________________________________________________________
Don?t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--