I've modiified a lot of my code and moved much of the logic into
functions. For example:
<xsl:function name="mods:year">
<xsl:param name="bibref" as="element(mods:mods)"/>
<xsl:for-each select="$bibref">
<xsl:value-of select="substring((mods:originInfo/mods:dateIssued,
mods:relatedItem/mods:originInfo/mods:dateIssued,
mods:relatedItem/mods:part/mods:date)[1],1,4)" />
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:function>
Because XSLT 2.0 and XQuery share the same data model (XPath 2.0), it's
easy to convert between them. Here's the equivalent function in the
eXist XML DB bibliographic example (which I use; I modified this
function to match the logic of my XSLT one):
declare function display:year($rec as element()) as xs:string? {
substring(($rec/mods:originInfo/mods:dateIssued,
$rec/mods:relatedItem/mods:originInfo/mods:dateIssued,
$rec/mods:relatedItem/mods:part/mods:date)[1],1,4)
};
I think based on this, I'm going to try where possible to have logic
defined in functions, and in xpath (2.0) rather than pure XSLT.
One design question: Mike Kay in his book on XSLT 2.0 advocates
function namespaces based on the namespace of the data they work on.
I ask because I'd like to keep the option open later to support formats
in other namespaces. So does this suggest using a namespace that
refers to the function rather than the input namespace?
Bruce
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--