Hi Bruce,
Sorry for not being clear enough, but I had meant to ask "why are
patterns like (foo) or (/child::foo) considered invalid patterns as
per XSLT specification ?"
Curious as to whether this kind of a pattern breaks any semantics of XSLT .
rgds,
Menon
On 5/2/05, Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
On 5/2/05, Ramkumar Menon <ramkumar(_dot_)menon(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
I run into a compilation error while using this stylesheet..
<xsl:template match="(/)">
<o1:NeverPrints/>
</xsl:template>
It should be just "/", in the same way that it's "foo" not "(foo)".
Bruce
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail:
<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--
Shift to the left, shift to the right!
Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte!
-Ramkumar Menon
A typical Macroprocessor
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--