It looks to me as if what you're trying to describe is
"group Tuv element by their @Lang value"
So you need to look up Muenchian grouping (or XSLT 2.0 xsl:for-each-group if
you can use 2.0). See http://www.jenitennison.com/xslt/grouping.
But I may have misunderstood your requirement completely - I don't
understand the notations in your problem description.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: Marcin Milkowski [mailto:milek_pl(_at_)o2(_dot_)pl]
Sent: 02 August 2005 16:13
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: [xsl] Transformation of hierarchy, changing levels,
and... back
hi,
I've been trying to make some transformation from a structure:
<Tu>
<Tuv>
@Lang
some text1
<df>some text2</df>
<ut>some optional text</ut>
some text
<ut>some more text</ut>
and some text
</Tuv>
<Tuv>
@Lang
some text
<df>
some text
</df>
<ut>some optional text</ut>
some text
<ut>some more text</ut>
and some text
</Tuv>
</Tu>
to a structure
<trans-unit> (=Tu)
@id
<source> (=Tu/Tuv(_at_)Lang=$blabla)
some text1
<g(_at_)id@barfoo/> (<df>)
some text2
<g(_at_)id@foobar/> (</df>)
<ph(_at_)id>some optional text</ph>(=ut)
some text
<ph(_at_)id>some more text</ut>
and some text
</source>
<target> (=Tu/Tuv(_at_)Lang=$foobar)
some text1
<g(_at_)id@barfoo/> (<df>)
some text2
<g(_at_)id@foobar/> (</df>)
<ph(_at_)id>some optional text</ph>(=ut)
some text
<ph(_at_)id>some more text</ut>
and some text
</target>
</trans-unit>
I tried to match //Tu, and then use for-each to match all
Tuv[1]/ut and
Tuv[2]/ut. This approach turned quite difficult because I had
to insert
ut at exactly the same position in source as it was in
Tuv[1]. Probably
I should use more templates and match //Tu/Tuv or something like
that, but I wouldn't know how to close the trans-unit tag (is there a
way to check if this Tuv is Tu/Tuv[1] or Tu/Tuv[2]?). Additionally, I
would need to produce a second file with ids replacing all
text between
tags in Tu/Tuv[1](_at_)Lang=foobar and Tu/Tuv[2](_at_)lLang=barfoo(_dot_) (So
the text
must be uniquely numbered, or indexed in the other file). The
third step
would be to backconvert the transformed files into a source one.
Any ideas what method would be the best in this case? All help very
appreciated.
Best regards,
Marcin Milkowski
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail:
<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--