Forgive me my confusion. I lost a link in the chain.
Thanks for your guide. I'll study that conscientiously.
Gabriel
-----Original Message-----
From: Ragulf Pickaxe [mailto:ragulf(_dot_)pickaxe(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com]
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 3:09 AM
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [xsl] Key problem. Ordering XML with conditions than generate
new associations.
Hi Gabriel,
On 9/28/05, Gabriel Osorio <gosorio(_at_)tournet(_dot_)com> wrote:
About: "RE: [xsl] Another <xsl:key> problem "
My intentions are educational. :-) I'm a beginner.
..
Really I do not have opinion. I used your template and did not obtain
results, because of it I sent the xml again.
Your recursion solution is elegant, but I can't understand the siblings
use.
Ah, I think you confuse Geert and me.
I made a scetch for Aaron, which was by no means a working solution.
Therefore it would not work without modification.
For the siblings use (and other things), I would recommend David
Pawsons FAQ: http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl/sect2/sect21.html
Regards,
Ragulf Pickaxe :-)
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--