I know this is a completely open question, but what kind of experience
have people had comparing the runtime performance and
throughput of XSLT
vs. "raw Java code"? I would guess the only scope limitation I could
give for this would be using Xalan and JDK 1.4.2.
Please don't measure with Xalan and assume that the results apply to XSLT
processors in general: other processors might be 10 times faster, or more.
I see many XSLT applications where the performance is dominated by parsing,
tree-building, and serialization. In such situations, Java isn't going to be
any faster.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--