xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: sorted for-each: preceding::sibling is not in sort order

2005-11-13 09:59:09


Thank you all for your insights. At least now I know that didn't miss
anything.

Michael wrote:

XSLT 2.0 allows you to use xsl:sequence
instead of xsl:copy-of, so you can construct a variable whose value is a
sequence of nodes (node references) without making copies of the nodes.

Wouldn't I once again have the problem with
preceding::sibling when they are references?

--
Ferdinand Soethe


--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--