Mm, perhaps I should have said "no *reasonable* way"? :->
I guess I'm being just too categorical today. I keep count()-based
tests buried in a drawer in my brain even deeper than the name tests.
Yikes, who needs em?
Cheers,
Wendell
At 05:10 PM 11/4/2005, David wrote:
> Bottom line is that XPath 1.0 gives no way to select all attributes
> *except* a given one other than the resort to the name test.
> XPath 2.0 can select "@* except attribute(xyz)", which is very nice.
which means in xpath 1 you can select
@*[count(.|../@xyz)=2] which is even nicer?
======================================================================
Wendell Piez
mailto:wapiez(_at_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--