I'm sorry, I left out my *rant* on .net datasets persisted to xml.
So, what is wrong with the original ADO save recordset as xml? At
first glance, sure the xml was difficult to read, but truly is a great
xml document to work with! Didn't anyone ever mention in the
microsoft camp there that xml elements named as field names is a bad
idea? That it is a much more useful source if the xml elements are
all named the same? Do I *rant* alone?
Karl..
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--