On Thursday 23 February 2006 08:22, Joe Fawcett wrote:
I don't know, but I can already see a slew of future posts to which the
reply will be:
Well originally these types were in the ... namespace but were moved rather
late in the game, you'll have to modify your ...
Yes, but this temporary confusion is also to me by no doubt preferred in front
of what we otherwise would have. Of course, I nevertheless have understanding
in how cumbersome this intrusive change.
I think it in this case can be good to compare different views from the XML
community. We cannot complain about W3C XML Schema(which we love to do!), and
also be conservative when trying to steer away from new failures. Improvement
requires work, it requires change.
Cheers,
Frans
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--