On 5/2/06, Michael Kay <mike(_at_)saxonica(_dot_)com> wrote:
> I've only tried this with Saxon 8.7.1 so I'm assuming it's
> intentional? Is there a good reason for this - something
> that I'm not seeing at the moment?
It's intentional and the reason for it is that people voted for it, but I
can't read their minds to tell you why they did so.
It can be quite convenient though when writing a micro-pipeline:
<xsl:variable name="selected-nodes" select="...."/>
<xsl:variable name="selected-nodes" select="if (XYZ) then $selected-nodes
else ...."/>
<xsl:variable name="selected-nodes" select="if (PQR) then $selected-nodes
else ...."/>
Hmmm the convenience of not having to use distinct variable names
versus a few hours debugging (followed by raw anger that you really
did make that mistake)....
At least its reasonably well known it seems. It came as a surprise to
me as it doesn't feel right for XSLT, which is usually more strict.
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--