xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [xsl] Absolute/relative positioning of graphic in XSL-FO

2006-05-23 15:30:37
The following works in Antenna House, but I see that it does not work 
in XEP ... I had anticipated it would:

   <block-container block-progression-dimension.minimum="3cm">
     <block>Test1</block>
   </block-container>
   <block>Test 1 end</block>
   <block-container block-progression-dimension.minimum="3cm">
     <block>Test2</block>
     <block>Test2</block>
     <block>Test2</block>
     <block>Test2</block>
     <block>Test2</block>
     <block>Test2</block>
     <block>Test2</block>
     <block>Test2</block>
     <block>Test2</block>
     <block>Test2</block>
   </block-container>
   <block>Test 2 end</block>

Thanks for the info.

I tried something like above with the transforms I'm currently working
on, and XEP does not appear to do the "right thing".

I even tried some variations (e.g. using block-progression-dimension on
<fo:block>s and experimenting interchanging block and block-container),
but nothing I tried gave the desired effect.  Things would
look okay if the textual data was small, but once I increased the
amount of text, the graphic did not move down.

I'll try to contact RenderX support to see what they have to say.

Thanks again,

--ewh

--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>