I am stuck with using XSL 1.0
xslt2's for-each-group makes it easier (or at least easier to read) but
any xslt 1 grouping construct would work here. Muenchian grouping (ie
using keys) is the usual approach, but making the keys unique in
subtrees rooted at each W is a bit tiresome, so unless you have 100's of
X below each W I'd just write it directly in XPath
something like
<xsl:for-each select="W">
<xsl:for-each select="X[not(@Y=../following-sibling::X/@Y)]">
something
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--