You've still got an extra <arbitrary> hanging around in <red> there.
er adding [something] to somewhere left as an exercise for the reader;-)
That is of course if I've scaled up the input correctly, no comment
from the OP so far.
Yes I was going to mention last night that some of the code made some
assumptions that may or may not have been correct about the input.
In all cases for example the methods I suggested would be very
intollerent of any input that didn't have dark//ligght matching
exactly. It would be possible to code it up more defensively to trap
such cases and give warnings etc.
David
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--