Frans Englich wrote:
When is the context item not redundant in a path expression?
Some examples:
./a/b/c
a/b/c/.
a/b/./c
a/b/././c
All of these are the same. The only case I know where two
expressions with and without "." as an entire NameTest have different
meanings is:
//some/path
.//some/path
Of course, "." is usefull in other constructs, as in "path[. eq
'string']" or "path[f:pred(.)]".
Regards,
--drkm
p4.vert.ukl.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sat Aug 26 15:13:45 GMT 2006
___________________________________________________________________________
Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet
!
Yahoo! Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos
expériences.
http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--