On 9/5/06, Colin Adams <colinpauladams(_at_)hotmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
Is your hope founded on knowledge of someone working on such an
implementation?
The fact is *I* am not aware of anyone doing this, which doesn't mean
anyone is not doing this.
--
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
>>For Dimitre, it can also be written as a divide and conquer
>>sum(empty-list)=0
>>sum(item)=item
>>sum(list)=sum(even-position-items)+ sum(odd-position-items)
>>
>>David
>
>
>What is becoming important with this is that not in the so distant
>future (I hope) an XSLT processor will calculate:
>
> sum(even-position-items)
>and
> sum(odd-position-items)
>
>in two different threads on two processors so that the total
>calculation will be approx. twice as fast.
>
>Parallelization is something very natural in functional programming,
>while it can be very difficult to achieve with imperative programming.
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters!
http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--