xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [xsl] base uri and % encoding

2006-09-11 06:40:07

There's been a very recent decision on this, that the base URI shouldn't be
%-encoded. (XML Base says it should but Infoset says it shouldn't). I don't
guarantee that Saxon 8.8 implements this decision - I need to check.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/ 

-----Original Message-----
From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc(_at_)nag(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk] 
Sent: 11 September 2006 11:25
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: [xsl] base uri and % encoding


Somewhere between the xsl, xquery, xdm, xml base and xml 
infoset drafts I got confused about when and if the values returned by
base-uri() and friends are % encoded.

using saxonB 8.8j as a reference, in XQuery 


   declare base-uri "data:,""";
   static-base-uri()

returns

data:,"


while the XSL

<xsl:stylesheet version="2.0" 
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"; 
xml:base="data:,&quot;">
  <xsl:template name="main">
    <xsl:value-of select="static-base-uri()"/>
  </xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>

returns

data:,%22




Are both those answers correct?
If so, is it possible for _any_ XSL stylesheet to produce the 
same output as the first XQuery?
If not, which one is wrong?

David

--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: 
<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--



--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>